[Shorewall-users] STARTUP_ENABLED required in shorewall-lite?

[Brian J. Murrell]

Is having to set STARTUP_ENABLED on the shorewall-lite side intended?

Seems to be a newish requirement and odd at that, on the shorewall-lite
end at least. The shorewall-lite.conf doesn't even have the header and
variable to set the way the shorewall.conf does.

Cheers,
b.

[Tom Eastep]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Post by Brian J. Murrell
Is having to set STARTUP_ENABLED on the shorewall-lite side
intended?

It is not intended, and on my own Shorewall-lite test system (5.0.14),
it does not seem to be required.

- -Tom
- --
Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
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=F7mz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------------------------------